On 09/04/10 18:24, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote: > Really? I understood it as the wiki being an all-purposes wiki, meaning users > could (would and should) create articles on how to get some application > running or how to get some setting working, and the developers will have > their own "section", so to speak, where they can collaborate on various > projects where a wiki would be an asset. > It seems to me from the discussion here on the list that it is to centralize > documentation (- the official docs), so that gentoo can point to the wiki and > say "If it's not in our docs, maybe it's in the wiki". > > I may have mistaken the actual purpose of the wiki, but then by all means, > correct me :-) > It has no purpose. The "official" wiki currently has no rules and no mission statement. There's been no activity for 3 days.
...in which time the unofficial wiki got countless edits in many languages. And my server downloaded backups 3 times (because we have a public backup policy in place to ensure the content is never lost again - something some people seem to like ignoring (or are just ignorant of)). AllenJB
