On Wednesday 21 April 2010 14:28:13 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> - gpg control packet
>
> On 21-04-2010 04:59, Vincent Launchbury wrote:
> > On 04/20/10 22:52, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> As suggested in bug 291860, I am heading up an infra cleanup project to
> >> disable/close some mailing lists. Since the list is quite large, I want
> >> to send it out for RFC.
> >
> > Going by archives.gentoo.org stats, the following lists are also
> > inactive, and are all listed as 'Primary Gentoo Mailing Lists' at
> > www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml
> >
> > If there's a reason to keep any of them, perhaps they should be split
> > off to a 'Low-traffic Lists' section, as I can't see them being of much
> > use to most people.
> >
> > gentoo-devrel
> >
> > 2010 - 0 posts
> > 2009 - 1 post
> > 2008 - 2 posts
> > 2007 - 8 posts
>
> IIRC, this list was created to promote a way for developers to discuss
> Developer Relations policies.
> Even though this is likely to be most of the time a low traffic list, I
> think it still has merit - unless we chose to promote such discussions
> on a different "forum".
Yes but we ( as developers ) tend to handle devrel bugs in a different way.
That is open bugs and assign it to devrel. INHO this mailing list is useless
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
