On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:01:55PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:55:42 +0300 > Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Oh come on. I never said to stop supporting those arches. I just said > > to shrink their stable tree. What do you suggest? Pretend to have > > active exotic arches just to look shiny and pretty? > > Claiming to support an exotic arch but forcing people to run ~arch on > it is not supporting it at all. One of the problems with exotic archs > is that they are much more likely to show up bugs than things that are > commonly used, and so knowing that something has been properly tested > is a lot more important there. > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh
Ok then according to your definition that supported arches == stable tree, I can safely assume that we cannot support those arches -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
pgpdR14Vav09n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
