On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:29:20 -0700 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins. > However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's > what many software projects (including Chromium) target. Could you name them? Opera looks into tons of directories. > Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins instead of mozilla/plugins, and how > relalistic would it be to switch to mozilla/plugins? Index: nsplugins.eclass =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/nsplugins.eclass,v retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -B -r1.24 nsplugins.eclass --- nsplugins.eclass 1 May 2009 23:03:00 -0000 1.24 +++ nsplugins.eclass 10 Aug 2010 23:21:19 -0000 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ DESCRIPTION="Based on the ${ECLASS} eclass" -PLUGINS_DIR="nsbrowser/plugins" +PLUGINS_DIR="mozilla/plugins" # This function move the plugin dir in src_install() to # ${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/${PLUGIN_DIR}. First argument should be You would then need to re-emerge all users of this eclass. All I want to ask is why? In fact *most browsers* have no trouble finding plugins, and provide options through which you can inform them where the plugins might be. What's bugging Chromium? Why does it insist on using a competing browser vendor's name instead of the much more neutral "nsbrowser", which generally denotes browsers with a Netscape style plugin interface? jer