Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 07.25 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan ha scritto: > > > That's just the DTD not getting validated. We can just change the DTD > and repoman won't complain about the XML being invalid. > What Matt was saying is that I actually asked for something that was explicitly printed by repoman scan, so that arch maintainers will know if they have to take particular care about the package.
-- Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
