On 25/01/11 22:33, Lars Wendler wrote: > Hi, > > I don'f feel very well with this idea especially because no matter how hard I > try I don't get comfortable with EAPI-3. No offense to our prefix guys, you > surely did a hell of a good job and EAPI-3 seems to really get you out of > quite some trouble you had with earlier EAPIs, but... > I for myself never tried a prefix installation and I don't have any > intentions > to do this in the foreseeable future so I still prefer EAPI-2 wherever I can > simply because EAPI-3 imposes overhead on my side which I have no real > benefit > from and I have no real clue about how to write proper EAPI-3 ebuilds. >
You can use EAPI=3 completely independent from prefix support.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
