On 01/31/2011 07:04 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > >> 2. I don't think it makes sense for QA to discipline developers >> permanently in these cases. They should suspend access pending Devrel >> resolution of the issue. Devrel should of course strongly consider >> the input of QA. > > That should be anyone's input, really. If a Gentoo Linux user finds a > nasty `rm -rf /' timebomb, I suppose he could point that out to infra > directly. And it's infra that suspends access, by the way. And devrel > should be the intermediate between developers. And QA "aims to keep the > portage tree in a consistent state"[1]. Wait, everyone is already in > place? >
Actually recruiters can also suspend commit access and DevRel lead has used that to safe guard the tree in the past. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
