-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/25/2011 09:55 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Dane Smith <c1p...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> @Trustees: Any thoughts? I didn't mean to step on any toes, I just
>> hadn't spotted that old bug until today.
> 
> So, speaking only for myself, my thinking is that there is enough
> debate over the truecrypt license that I see no point in not just
> playing it safe and restricting mirroring.  Restricting mirroring will
> make Gentoo itself not a party to any redistribution (at least not a
> direct party).  If we further restrict fetching you could argue that
> we're getting ourselves out of the facilitation business as well (not
> a legal theory I'm enamored with).
> 
> I'd like to propose that devs should not commit ebuilds that do not
> have mirroring restrictions unless the license is in
> @BINARY-REDISTRIBUTABLE.  Perhaps this should be a repoman check.
> Whether something ends up in that group is more complicated, but
> repoman doesn't need to worry about that.
> 
> Neither Debian nor Ubuntu redistribute TrueCrypt.  That at the very
> least should give us concern with doing so.  Their license is also not
> considered free by any of the usual bodies.
> 
> Sure, it is a little hassle for users, but not that much in the big
> scheme of things - especially since other distros don't package it at
> all.  Better to let any lawyers we retain focus on getting the
> foundation in better order and not have them fighting over licenses.
> 
> Rich
> 

These are all good enough reasons for me. Re-Restricted mirror and fetch
in CVS. Thanks =)

- -- 
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=emar
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to