On Sunday, June 12, 2011 17:16:08 Francesco R wrote: > 2011/6/11 Mike Frysinger: > > On Saturday, June 11, 2011 16:24:00 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:58:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > > So, effectively the QA team lead can appoint the people who elect > >> > > him. I'm not at all implying that Diego would abuse his position, > >> > > but still I think that this is not a sane situation. > >> > > >> > it does seem trivial to remove people who disagree with you and thus > >> > cement an echo chamber > >> > >> Are you talking in a hypothetical future situation, or has this already > >> happened? If so, can you point to an example of where Diego's been > >> removing people for disagreeing with him, rather than for disagreeing > >> with the Council? > > > > how is disagreeing with a Council decision valid grounds either ? > > punting people because they disagree with any group isn't really valid. > > If you are in the role of enforcing decision of the council and with > "disagreeing" you mean acting versus their decision yes it's a very > much valid ground.
i never said acting against council decisions, and neither did Ciaran, and so far, no one has shown me doing such a thing -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
