On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 22/06/2011 06:19 ??, Dane Smith wrote: > > - gpg control packet > > All, > > [..] > > Thanks! > > > > [1] http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/03/c1phers-adopt-a-package-program/ > > > Hi Dane, > > I tried to do the same a year ago. Have a look here. It may help you > understand why that effort did not succeed > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/209204
I see concerns about to-be-orphaned ebuilds where proxied maintainers only care about the ebuild for a short period. This would only be a problem with new ebuilds that will be added to the tree with a proxy maintainer. Instead of encouraging that, this project could have a goal to reduce m-n packages by assigning proxy maintainers. So no new packages, only old ones revived. Sounds reasonable to me. Although I didn't read the full thread, so please don't decapitate me if there were other concerns.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part