On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 22/06/2011 06:19 ??, Dane Smith wrote:
> > - gpg control packet
> > All,
> > [..]
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > [1] http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/03/c1phers-adopt-a-package-program/
> > 
> Hi Dane,
> 
> I tried to do the same a year ago. Have a look here. It may help you
> understand why that effort did not succeed
> 
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/209204

I see concerns about to-be-orphaned ebuilds where proxied maintainers
only care about the ebuild for a short period. This would only be a
problem with new ebuilds that will be added to the tree with a proxy
maintainer. Instead of encouraging that, this project could have a goal
to reduce m-n packages by assigning proxy maintainers.
So no new packages, only old ones revived. Sounds reasonable to me.

Although I didn't read the full thread, so please don't decapitate me if
there were other concerns.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to