On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:16:14 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:14, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:47:42 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 22:19:09 Michał Górny wrote: > >> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:46:13 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > >> > > Ok, the option that I'm looking at now is to set up openrc so > >> > > that the init scripts are optional and whether or not they are > >> > > installed is controlled by a use flag which I will default to > >> > > on in IUSE. Most people would leave this flag alone, but if > >> > > you want to use something like systemd and do not want the > >> > > init scripts or the /etc/runlevels directory on your system, > >> > > you would just re-emerge openrc with this flag disabled. > >> > > > >> > > For now this flag will just control init scripts installation, > >> > > but I will also look into taking it further and not installing > >> > > other parts of openrc, such as binaries, man pages, etc which > >> > > are only used if you are working on init scripts. > >> > > >> > Wouldn't it be better to just leave these people with > >> > INSTALL_MASK? USEflag means needless rebuilds just for the > >> > benefit of one file. > >> > >> so you're saying the solution for systemd users is to setup > >> INSTALL_MASK and we shouldnt worry about tweaking openrc at all ? > > > > Have you even heard the word called 'context'? It might be too short > > for your taste. > > perhaps if you focused less on being snarky and more on the thread > content, you'd realize that the context here is "providing > /etc/init.d/functions.sh support for non-openrc users". that was the > point of William's e-mail that is at the start of this current > "context". And if you focused more on reading what others write, you'd realize that the whole citation here mentions only installing init.d scripts and /etc/runlevels? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
