-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/11/11 04:00, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:33:15 +0300 Samuli Suominen > <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> It's not like fastened lastriting hasn't happened before. I >> question your motives in picking this particular one. It's not >> like I expected cookies for the time I've put into this porting >> effort, but not this "attack" either. > > Then stop trying to remove packages that have an active maintainer. > I could have sworn that was written down somewhere. > > Isn't this the same situation with gcc stabilizations? Once the timeframe for fixing broken packages with e.g gcc-4.5 is passed, the remaining broken packages will be gone.
- -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOk+uhAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCPaIP/0WOzleagPvw82n7yPN3RO5U DSOYXsSr64gpbRFI1w+3/lBE50fNvWAA7taRU2+c6ccHA1AcC99iPJ+FIymxZFck 2C4hRHRNhigxwZw+n+SBzXG2hNL+fvzWrRWdWOPz9WLjWr3DQF9XENIQz9rwBEij f2QdTbIK99BEgHl5ibYFI6yhHDbtYBaBLNI9TbBQsGvNhjT0UM1+FHNFRvCPxERY m/U/Ps+2sETa5Hf+FQou5rFUptJvY45BVriggDK9mQ1R7gHo9H5m7RkGPrZAKprC kZ0pRZkYrWGkdVk4FZXQPJcx6DAQ/WvrJH3JGmSL6nC3lVLK+htLbsSC+NSjFqsN 02k7XSkdRVQPWkv6bPqdQMcDg55pc+pKaW4nzi69T+1aoMomgxEwHrTOfeXyOeN5 Wu7Abgg+W75aZLXzW+dzn3etCCW/3ha8GoQwqzTIGmd7hedWhmaiKfmCUZbM/Ac5 4tWnHSvA0BK4vI3NGrV8BZLO8FKrGDnSu6tHGosgcQ5HMlm4YFOmMOGmfO271Ecg bA9YjpQZCX2BiJ6FwaDuY1NLNxcT1djvsVNg+t+7ZbLyQ1r4s7OXiTPHmfDURK0h af08Ap1OzeBP434zSjBxU1JU40zk3eeb4/QWaAk9S+gGU05hC6jnIEpA0vY6q0ep Tl/SvNyjpN3MUh0FG8SZ =o4f/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
