* Michał Górny schrieb am 05.01.12 um 09:26 Uhr: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:30:07 +0100 > Marc Schiffbauer <msch...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > * Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr: > > > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100 > > > > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > /bin/systemctl > > > > > libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 > > > > > > > > Here is a prime example of why "vertical integration" should > > > > really be called "a horrible mess of tight coupling"... > > > > > > You clearly have failed to realize that d-bus is a now the bus for > > > system messaging and is as much part of the system as syslog or > > > bash. Probably even more so, for example, in Fedora 17, you'll be > > > able to boot without syslog or bash, but you need d-bus. > > > > IMO a system should *always* be bootable without that "high level" > > stuff. And by bootable I mean that you can get a root prompt at > > least. > > And why do you consider D-Bus being high-level? Just because things > used to reinvent the wheel before in a much worse fashion?
I meant "hight-level" only in a way that it is not really needed to boot the very basic things of a system so that I can get a root prompt at the console at least. E.g. you do not need dbus to find and mount the rootfs, fire a getty and shell. -Marc -- 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134
pgp25u9OqPf4y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
