El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:21 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 22:02 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: > > > On 03/09/2012 09:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: > > > >> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:02:23 +0100 > > > >> Pacho Ramos<pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > >>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > >>>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > >>>>>> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like > > > >>>>>> herds are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think > > > >>>>>> we should drop that herds and move their packages to > > > >>>>>> maintainer-needed in a week or so. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> What do you think? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :( > > > >>>> > > > >>>> and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now > > > >>> > > > >>> Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd: > > > >>> - Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and > > > >>> reflect reality) > > > >>> - Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports > > > >>> > > > >>> The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages > > > >>> to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want > > > >> > > > >> For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope, > > > >> removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping > > > >> the herd. > > > >> > > > > > > > > OK but, what about the rest? ;) > > > > > > Please leave at least media-optical@ be as it is. Changing it doesn't > > > make any sense. > > > > > > > > > > Well, the idea would be to get their bugs assigned to maintainer-needed > > and media-optical CCed if somebody wants to take that stuff someday, it > > would reflect better reality as, currently, their bugs are being > > assigned to an empty herd (yes, xarthisius (I think he was in alias but > > not officially in herd last time I checked, anyway it's only one > > example, nothing personal against him of course :)). What will occur > > when he simply drops his mail from alias as he never wanted to be a > > member of that herd? What would occur if he only wants to maintain some > > packages but others are getting ignored? > > > > The idea to get them moved to "orphan" is to reflect reality and, that > > way, try to get developers (or users willing to proxy maintain them) > > involved on exact apps they really want to keep maintained. > > As talked just now with Samuli, he added him to media-optical (both, to > alias and herds.xml) and then, this no longer applies to media-optical > obviously ;) >
Will then do the following: - Add a <maintainer> tag to their metadatas to get bugs assigned to maintainer-needed - Keep herd to get it CCed (like was done some weeks ago with openoffice herd) This applies to "sgml" and "text-markup" since media-optical is active again and looks like net-zope packages will go away soon
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
