El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 22:41 -0500, Paul Varner escribió: > On 3/19/12 2:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 10:56 -0500, Paul Varner escribió: > >> On 03/18/12 13:50, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: > >>> > >>> app-portage/maintainer-helper > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks for taking them > >> > >> I've added app-portage/maintainer-helper to the tools-portage herd, > >> however, I've left it as maintainer-needed. So if anyone wants to take > >> it, feel free. The tools-portage herd will fix bugs for it as we find > >> the time. > > > > I disagree with leaving maintainer-needed as default assign, if you will > > fix bugs when you have time it's better than what I will do with > > maintainer-needed packages. > > Okay, I've taken out the maintainer-needed as the maintainer and have > just left it assigned to the herd. However, in reading through > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=4, I > don't see a good mechanism to convey that the package is up for grabs, > but in the meantime go ahead and assign any bugs to the herd. > > Regards, > Paul > >
Yeah, a mechanism for indicating a package is up for grabs would be interesting, the problem is how to prevent people from tagging as so a lot of packages and, then, making that mechanism completely useless as wouldn't distinct between "real" up for grabs packages or not "as real" :( But thanks a lot for taking care :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
