-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 20/03/2012 10:47, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mar, 20-03-2012 a las 11:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: >> On 03/20/2012 11:36 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 20:48 +0000, Markos Chandras >>> escribió: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 >>>> >>>> On 03/19/2012 08:32 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>>>> El dom, 18-03-2012 a las 20:29 -0400, Chris Reffett >>>>> escribió: >>>>>> Hi, I'd be interested in helping with www-servers, but I >>>>>> would have to help by proxy because I am not a dev yet. >>>>>> Chris Reffett >>>>>> >>>>>> On 03/18/12 15:27, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>>>>>> With bass retirement (#391429) lcd has become empty, is >>>>>>> anybody willing to join or should their packages be >>>>>>> moved to maintainer-needed (CCing that empty herd to >>>>>>> allow somebody joining in the future to easily >>>>>>> resurrect the herd)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for offering your help, will CC gentoo-dev mailing >>>>> list and proxy-maint to see how we could handle this case >>>>> >>>> It is very unlikely for proxy-maintainers to proxy an entire >>>> herd. Sorry >>>> >>>> - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key >>>> ID: B4AFF2C2 >>> >>> We need to try to find a way to let him contribute, the problem >>> is that I don't know much about Chris to know if he is ready to >>> try to become a gentoo-dev in the near future :S >> >> I find the whole concept of www-servers herd flawed. It's not >> very likely one person would be running many different servers, >> and thus be able to contribute to them. >>
That's my case tbh, I co-maintain a www-servers package but don't feel like being able to maintain the whole of them as I just don't use them all. >> Propably why the team has no members in the first place... >> >> > > Then, the way to go would be to move them to maintainer-needed and > let people pick whatever they want. I agree and can do it myself > just now if you let me do I think that's a good idea and reasonable way to go. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk9pje8ACgkQKiQSS7ZY+hP2cAD/Wix5cEM6YuFMu4V/l3sTZTci eBHwWjKVBHTb1+G/HmsA/3HPgxNSesEedPWLxgQ0f7Rk1W2QZTq2S99WVdIPNeyq =lrz9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
