El vie, 27-04-2012 a las 21:12 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include > > anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of > > candidates for EAPI 5? > > Let's continue this on the PMS list. > > * user patches > > * EAPI parsing > > * the things that were left out of 4: > > + slot operator deps > > + profile IUSE > > * No -j1 for src_test > > * Remove deprecated stuff > > * Zero or one REQUIRED_USE operator > > These might be cheap now? > > * New bash version > > * Get a versionator replacement into the PM >
Could: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408693 be handled also? Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
