> On 2 June 2012 03:12, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> "git cat-file -p $sha" is as close as you can get to commit objects > >> without needing to write your own decompressing wrapper. But it gives > >> the same results. > > > > Now, does the "signed data" also contain the parent sha? > > > > If yes, our discussion about rebasing is moot, because a rebase will in > > every case destroy previous signatures. > > Yes. Which basically means, you *cannot* have both > > a) rebase only merges > and > b) every commit must be signed > > as policies. >
I would say that this is a very strong argument in favour of allowing merge commits. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer kde, sci, arm, tex, printing
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
