On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400 Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > > René Neumann <li...@necoro.eu> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' > > > of base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available > > > everywhere, i.e. should each eclass make sure it imports and > > > incorporates it. Or is it just an eclass like the others and > > > ebuilds should make sure they inherit it if needed? > > > > No. It is unmaintained, has serious design flaws and it simply > > should not be used anywhere. At least in EAPI != [01]. > > > > what is the PATCHES=() replacement in new eapis? (mainly why i use > base.eclass more and more these days) That's what I used: [[ ${PATCHES} ]] && epatch "${PATCHES[@]}" -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature