On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400 Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
> Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> > René Neumann <li...@necoro.eu> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status'
> > > of base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available
> > > everywhere, i.e. should each eclass make sure it imports and
> > > incorporates it. Or is it just an eclass like the others and
> > > ebuilds should make sure they inherit it if needed?
> >
> > No. It is unmaintained, has serious design flaws and it simply
> > should not be used anywhere. At least in EAPI != [01].
> >
>
> what is the PATCHES=() replacement in new eapis? (mainly why i use
> base.eclass more and more these days)
That's what I used:
[[ ${PATCHES} ]] && epatch "${PATCHES[@]}"
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
