On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 06:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:58:30 > +0200 as excerpted: > > > Kent Fredric schrieb: > >> On 23 July 2012 08:48, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina > >> <zeroch...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >>> I do see some advantage of the current way of putting the > >>> firmware in the category of what it is for... > >> > >> If you wanted, you could do something like x11-drivers/ do , and > >> have a standard of adding a little subcategorization: > > > > Could you be more specific? What does x11-drivers/ do that applies > > here? > > x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati > x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel > > x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev But you are aware that this is *upstream* naming? Similarly, ati-drivers (which is not upstream naming :P) and nvidia-drivers don't follow the suite. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
