>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 07/26/2012 12:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> Indeed, and this opens another can of worms since (as far as I can see) >> there >> are no specific license clauses in the AAC patent license for applications >> that may be distributed without cost. I.e., licensing fees still apply as >> "per >> unit fee".
> Tell me where I should categorize it =) I believe that I can go to BINARY-REDISTRIBUTABLE. But please check if the following rules apply here: # - MAY require explicit inclusion of the license with # the distribution [1] # - IFF there is an explicit inclusion requirement, USE=bindist # MUST cause a copy of the license to be installed in a file # location compliant with the license, Ulrich [1] <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6c950b46c50fe72ebc5e650bbf70f77c.xml>
