On 08/09/2012 09:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:42:15 +0200
> Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> Repeat after me: having your first process require anything more than
>> libc is stupid and dangerous.
> 
> But you are aware that glibc is probably much, much worse than most of
> those 'stupid and dangerous' libraries, right?

Then we have a bigger problem, since everything in our system is based
on that.

>> Once that concept gets accepted then we could discuss about why
>> reinventing shellscript may not be that sound and other less glaring,
>> horrid and appalling design choices.
> 
> Yes, exactly. So why does openrc reinvent that horrible shellscript?

It is not re-invented, in fact we can use any compatible shell.

lu


Reply via email to