Hi! On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Duncan wrote: > Now, for worst-case comparison, on the same machine, what's the > respective times for a full systemd build? (I'm not saying actually > merge it, just configure/compile, plus see the next paragraph.)
I think my first set of numbers illustrates that: just running "make" should be a full build, AIUI. For that scenario (and the machine in question, the factor was somewhere between 9 and 10 times slower for a full build. > So far, the results are encouraging. Higher times, but not THAT much > higher, with the new version. But if the worst happens and we really DO > end up building all of systemd and then throwing most of it away, what's > the relative times for THAT? That's actually what I was asking earlier, > and this gets us part way to the answers, but not all the way. > > Regardless, thanks, this is considerably more solid information than was > available earlier, and not everyone has a geode to actually do the test > on, so these numbers are a real contribution to the available > information, indeed! =:^) I'll try the whole thing again sometime later this week (in my copious free time!). Regards, Tobias
