On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:31:29 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:27:55 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > But what I was saying is that I dislike the implicit 'no label == > > build+run'. It's unclear, very unclear. > > > > Why the heck: > > > > ( foo/bar ) > > > > introduces another label than: > > > > use? ( foo/bar ) > > > > ? > > Labels are propagated into child blocks, so it doesn't introduce a new > label. I think you've misunderstood something here... Right, too many ()s for me. Then my argument that I want us to require explicit label at start of global () still holds. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
