On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:44:33 -0700
Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:10:21 +0200
> > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
> >> Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
> >> > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
> >> > > Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > you dont need this, the PM has already done the work for you:
> >> > > > call directly the relevant function.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > src_multilib_compile() {
> >> > > > forall ABIS; do
> >> > > > prepare ABI variables
> >> > > > src_compile
> >> > > > done
> >> > > > }
> >> > >
> >> > > Err, what? Who calls the function? Where?
> >> >
> >> > bash. here.
> >>
> >> How can an eclass call a phase function while eclass needs to be
> >> called from the phase function to call the phase function...?
> >>
> >
> > Read again. Esp. the part you deleted.
> > I never said it should do this, on purpose...
> >
>
> I'm especially confused by what your point is. I can't see how your
> snippet could ever work, and you're being evasive about answering
> that.
>
both of you are putting words in my mouth then: obviously, if you call
your eclass multilib and the above function multilib_src_compile and
then pass it through EXPORT_FUNCTIONS, then it will loop.
let me copy paste what i wrote for you:
"""
then, in a future EAPI, let the PM call src_multilib_compile instead
of src_compile if multilib is requested.
"""
nothing more...
