-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/25/2012 05:57 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > I guess nothing is preventing them from reviewing it. However, > it's just a waste of time if you're just asking those guys to > review the GLEP, isn't it? > >
That's what the GLEP workflow states, no? It's currently not accepted. On 09/25/2012 05:23 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Really? I thought it was pretty clearly. Yes, you need an > implementation beforehand. > Maybe you should read: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0001.html "The reference implementation must be completed before any GLEP is given status "Final", but it need not be completed before the GLEP is accepted." This is not about some EAPI stuff, this is about getting it _accepted_ not _implemented_. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQYdWfAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzjjIH/218/i8cD6jzdTOFskLQr8O8 PxOZAPDsRxKz9sVBLcN5I01RRATnr/xbhcomDa+/rLGP8Zz1ljk7mEwaXhXGg6fN l/lV0I62cjfWx1OJj9nqgq847TLLw1w+TKM/jfDvu2VXtMwBqiyg1U7+CeN7RWVH YdFOzKi3lJ1zH5oryT98htr6s+hceFie4JERlveODQn56vGG45c5c9vM0x7xxDce d+7lRozoEwp4AJA70zNskpEojYrJpBJNES/dt7GYO/Rt+sIqac4S8tUvNV3ro2a9 LV+Lr+qLvughdLtpewt95U63zeQJvfVbGIGwRlAaaUWYEI1IlOED6X25Zv3rQXo= =yexa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
