On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:08:24 +0000 Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 14 December 2012 14:59, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> We already have plenty of understaffed arches, I don't think it is > >> wise to throw more responsibilities to them. Unless of course all > >> developers are allowed to touch these *stable* profiles which > >> personally I don't like because arches will lose > >> control of their stable trees. > > > > I'd like to point out that my proposal implies that the *current* > > arches become the stable arches, and new sub-arches would be > > the testing ones. Therefore, everyone will be allowed to touch like > > everyone is allowed to touch the *stable* profiles today. > > > > In other words, we mask python_targets_pypy* in the base profiles, > > and unmask them in the testing sub-profiles for amd64 & x86. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Michał Górny > > I fear that the stable and testing profiles will diverge way too much > as time passes. But if you feel that maintainers and > herds will be able to keep the 'diff' between them as minimum as > possible, then I have no objections. Well, my hope is that we will be able to do it mostly via a common 'testing' profile (or per-arch testing profiles) which will be parents to other sub-profiles. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
