On Tue, 2012-12-25 at 15:09 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mar, 06-11-2012 a las 12:35 -0600, Paul Varner escribió: > > All: > > > > The following packages in the tools-portage herd are effectively > > unmaintained packages and need a maintainer to step up and maintain them. > > > > app-portage/deltup
homepqge link is broken. the SF link in the ebuild is a rediredirect to www.deltup.org which is a dead link. The SF page files releases doesn't list the 0.4.4 that we have in tree. It stops at 0.4.3 hmm. I just emerged it, seems slyfox is maintaining it's dep of dev-util/bdelta which has had a release just this last June. But it's homepage link is the same dead deltup.org one. It is from the same author. The SF deltup pages only have files releases up to 0.1.0 (dated 2006) for bdelta. > > app-portage/epm Nothing > > app-portage/maintainer-helper I looked at it, installed it, but had to fix a small bug just to get it to run. Outside of that I heard from no-one about it. For me, it would be easier to add the few capabilities that were actually coded to porthole than to learn the code and pyQT to develop it, since the data it provided and displayed, porthole already displays and more. IMHO tree-clean it > > app-portage/splat it's perl :(, I don't do perl. The homepage link is dead. Only the base net address is alive and is just a resume for the author. I heard nothing. > > app-portage/ufed Several users provided some patches to update it for the make.conf and profiles changes. It has been updated in tree. > > > > If no one steps up in the next 30 days, I will be moving them out of the > > herd and to maintainer-needed and they will be candidates for the > > treecleaners. > > > > Regards, > > Paul Varner > > tools-portage lead > > > > > > What did occur finally with them? -- Brian Dolbec <dol...@gentoo.org>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
