On Monday 31 December 2012 18:23:06 Maxim Kammerer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday 30 December 2012 13:47:40 Maxim Kammerer wrote: > >> Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they > >> worked: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432020 > >> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14498 > > > > (1) i doubt it and (2) this isn't a discussion of bugs in nscd > > It's relevant to the discussion, because glibc databases are an > alternative to running nscd. As a desktop user, I run nscd even on a > desktop without YP/NIS+, because I don't like the idea of glibc > functions parsing plain text files on each related query. I would use > glibc databases instead of nscd if that was a reliable option.
one uncommonly used feature on the desktop vs another uncommonly used feature on the desktop doesn't really add much -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
