On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> wrote: > Michael Mol <mikemol <at> gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc <at> gentoo.org> wrote: >> > Speaking of which, say what you will about Mozilla's broken criteria >> > for root inclusion, but Mozilla has no commercial interests, >> >> Wait, what? How does taking income during a process not constitute a >> commercial interest? > > There seems to be some confusion about Mozilla's cert inclusion process. > Mozilla > does not make any money by including CA certificates. Per its own policy [1], > "We will not charge any fees to have a CA's certificate(s) distributed with > our > software products." > > [1] > https://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/certs/policy/InclusionPolicy.html
Fair enough. I took Rich's email as an indication they did. -- :wq
