-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 21-12-12 13:32, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On 21 December 2012 17:36, Ciaran McCreesh > <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:21:57 +0000 Markos Chandras >> <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> Your tone is not appropriate for discussion. If you don't like >>> the existing policy, bring it to the list with a better >>> attitude so we can try and discuss it. But given that you want >>> to pick a fight with your email, I will most likely ignore >>> this thread and keep doing our job like we do for many years. >> >> http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m93x01rSVK1qjvxfho1_1280.jpg > > And that also makes a convenient way to always ignore the tone of > an argument, regardless of whether it is justified or not.
You say that as if it is a bad thing. If we were all a little less easily offended, communication would be more effective. > I find that Markos' objection is not unfounded and your argument > is irrelevant here. It is fine to discuss tone too, but let's not use tone as an argument to not respond to content. Marijn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDq5M4ACgkQp/VmCx0OL2zqOQCfX0jBZy8i/jH6rVTvONN4/d5u gKkAnRK54RHeUXgJLYfVm5+VL76xXrzQ =MqQO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
