On 01/09/2013 12:40 AM, justin wrote: > My question, did anybody else might have observed similar things? Is > there a flaw in this *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff?
There could well be, but even in the absence of the *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff, the problem that you're describing could be attributed to eclass conflicts that cause order of inheritance to make a difference. For example, it could be that multilib.eclass definitions conflict with one or more other eclasses, as noted here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450988#c1 -- Thanks, Zac