130119 Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 19 January 2013 21:46, Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Maybe lib-qt ? dev-qt sounds confusing to me too, what's "dev" about it?
> These are libraries and applications
> that are used by developers of end-user applications.
They are also encountered by users when updating KDE etc.
> If there is too much opposition to a simple "qt" category
> -- at least there seems to be some quite vocal opposition -- ,
> then dev-qt is in my eyes the next best alternative.
'qt' alone is inconsistent with the rest of the tree.
> A third option we came up with is qt-framework.
Too long to type & again no parallel in the existing tree.
> Somewhat comparable categories in the current tree
> are dev-dotnet and gnustep-{base,libs}.
Flame-eyes' suggestion is simple, consistent & involves least change :
'x11-qt/qt-core' 'x11-qt/qt-gui' etc. Please do it like that.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
