On 6 February 2013 13:55, Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> wrote: > On 06/02/2013 14:52, Markos Chandras wrote: >> I see a lot of inconsistencies in the init scripts. Some of them are >> using /var/run, others use /run. I just checked my box, and there is >> no /var/run although some init scripts are trying to use it. Which one >> is the correct one and why do we have both? The following guide only >> mentions /var/run > > We should be migrating to /run at this point. > > http://goo.gl/hrWcN > > -- > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ >
Thanks. Would it made sense to symlink /var/run -> /run so we don't end up with stable entries in /var/run directory? Some of my init scripts appear to reported as "crashed" whereas the process is running just fine. I suspect this is because a stale entry is in /var/run directory (or /run I am not sure) -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
