On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:52:45 +0100 Sebastian Pipping <sp...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Looks like great work so far. > > > On 11.02.2013 01:20, Michał Górny wrote: > > Secondly, I'd like to make it clear that the old python.eclass is > > 'almost' deprecated. We're in process of converting the in-tree > > packages to use the new eclasses but that's a lot of work [3]. > > > > [..] > > > > [3]:http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/python-r1/conversion.xhtml > > I wonder what would be the best way to help with conversion for devs > with a few hours to contribute? Write docs ;). We need more complete, cleaner docs. > - Where does one go for peer review and how many eyes should be on > related commits? I guess #gentoo-python would be a good place. Look for me or floppym especially. > - Should package "owners" be contacted in all cases? Well, I assumed that packages in Python herd can be converted without contacting other maintainers. For other packages, I opened a bug. > - Are there any conversion sprints already or in the future? No. To be honest, I dislike unnecessary rush. The migration is a good moment to find bugs in Python ebuilds and fix them. Well, definitely better than 'review Python-related code' bugs :P. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
