On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:01:51 +0200 Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 24/02/13 16:17, hasufell wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 02/24/2013 11:11 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > >> On 24/02/2013 11:06, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> Then don't put 'autotools' in the name. > >> > >> +1 > >> > > > > That would be multilib-minimal.eclass then? > > Sounds good to me. > > > ABCD also suggested something else: > > autotools-multilib.eclass -> autotools-utils-multilib.eclass > > This makes sense too, autotools-multilib.eclass is misleading as it > embeds the "unrelated" autotools-utils.eclass > > So it seems currently that some are against this eclass, some are > against the whole idea and favour multilib-portage, some are against > using autotools-utils.eclass for this, ... > Some people are already committing the eclass version changes/fixes to > tree, some are filing bug reports about bugs caused by it, ... > > It would be nice if people agreed but I guess that is not happening, so > i'll be pushing this eclass to tree under name 'multilib-minimal.eclass' > if I don't hear compelling arguments for not doing so, or in case you > push it before me No, don't do it. Or at least wait till I clean up multilib-build a bit. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
