On Mar 3, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mike Frysinger" <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Saturday 02 March 2013 20:50:17 Markos Chandras wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2013 1:43 AM, "Mike Frysinger" <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Friday 01 March 2013 07:45:28 Markos Chandras wrote: > > > > On 1 March 2013 08:16, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > > vapier 13/03/01 08:16:02 > > > > > > > > > > Modified: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog > > > > > Log: > > > > > Add arm lovin. > > > > > > > > > > --- confuse-2.7.ebuild 30 Oct 2012 11:18:49 -0000 1.12 > > > > > +++ confuse-2.7.ebuild 1 Mar 2013 08:16:02 -0000 1.13 > > > > > > > > > > -KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 sparc x86 > > > > > ~sparc-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~x86-interix ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux > > > > > ~ppc-macos ~x86-macos ~x86-solaris" +KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 arm hppa > > > > > ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 sparc > > > > > x86 ~sparc-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~x86-interix ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux > > > > > ~ppc-macos ~x86-macos ~x86-solaris" > > > > > > > > straight to stable? Not even keeping it to testing just for a week or > > > so? > > > > > > looks that way > > > > Ok good to know you break the rules on purpose > > complain to me when all these arm systems that totally had confuse already > installed go down in fire. it literally makes 0 difference here. > -mike
Why would they have it installed (in stable) if it had no keywords? and if it is such an important package why it didn't have testing keywords in the first place? I did't say it broke something, it just feels strange and this is why I asked
