On 6 March 2013 15:12, Maxim Koltsov <maksbo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 2013/3/6 Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu>:
>> On 06/03/2013 15:23, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> Can't say I'm likely to be a leechcraft user, but the original
>>> proposal indicated they were up to 60 now, and had at least 10-20 more
>>> in the works.  I don't think a category is unreasonable, and if at
>>> some point in time popularity wanes and it needs treecleaning it makes
>>> the whole task that much easier...
>>
>> I would have said no for 61 (as I would have expected them to wane, as
>> you said) — for 100 I'm fine, if that's happening.
>
> So, what have we decided? I'm pretty sure it'll go up to 100 quite soon.
>
>> --
>> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
>> flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
>>
>

I have no problem with the new category. We recently created a new
category for the Qt packages which has around 20 packages in it, so I
am not sure why Diego wants more than 100 packages for the new
category.

-- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang

Reply via email to