On 6 March 2013 15:12, Maxim Koltsov <maksbo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > 2013/3/6 Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu>: >> On 06/03/2013 15:23, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> Can't say I'm likely to be a leechcraft user, but the original >>> proposal indicated they were up to 60 now, and had at least 10-20 more >>> in the works. I don't think a category is unreasonable, and if at >>> some point in time popularity wanes and it needs treecleaning it makes >>> the whole task that much easier... >> >> I would have said no for 61 (as I would have expected them to wane, as >> you said) — for 100 I'm fine, if that's happening. > > So, what have we decided? I'm pretty sure it'll go up to 100 quite soon. > >> -- >> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes >> flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ >> >
I have no problem with the new category. We recently created a new category for the Qt packages which has around 20 packages in it, so I am not sure why Diego wants more than 100 packages for the new category. -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang