On 10/03/13 20:04, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:44:18 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal <tomas.chva...@gmail.com> wrote:
If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to
ignore the rules to really fix stable, but was this such case for
sure?
I've done straight to stable keywording _many_ times. The rationale is
that with no previous version stable for a particular architecture,
there really are no users who could see _regressions_, hence waiting
the nominal thirty days is meaningless in this case.
agreed, this is how I work too
