On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined, > > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license > > agreement and an option to also sign an assignment-like document based > > on the FSFe FLA, please speak up this week. > I've already said this before, but I guess I need to say it again: > If a contributor license is required to be signed, I'll have to > stop contributing to Gentoo. Did you read the entire email? We explicitly listed one of the options as (voluntary FLA/CLA AND mandatory DCO).
Could you clarify that you're objecting to that as well? In your case, you could elect NOT to sign the FLA/CLA. Regardless, all of your commits would have the DCO SoB signature. The kernel is where we got the mandatory DCO concept. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85