El jue, 28-03-2013 a las 19:15 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: > Hello, > > As discussed with ulm, I'd like to start a thread for collecting > initial items for EAPI 6. Preferably items which are either almost > ready or are easy to implement and are non-controversial. In other > words, thing which are practically ready to get on the actual list. > > As usual, each item should have a corresponding 'Future EAPI' bug which > blocks the tracker [1]. > > [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=future-eapi > > > My propositions: > > a) for improving self-consistency of EAPI (high priority): > > - #463586: move get_libdir to EAPI (since it is used in econf). > > - #459692: split the doc-installation part of default_src_install > (e.g. as einstalldocs). > > - #451938: provide a 'die' variant respecting 'nonfatal' (to implement > custom helpers respecting 'nonfatal'). > > > b) for improving ebuild & eclass development: > > - #449862: tidy up IUSE checking. > > - #449806: support using DOCS to append to the standard document list. > > - #431340: allow bash-4.2 (may require additional policy restrictions). > > - #273101: explicit variable for no. of parallel jobs (rather than > hacking MAKEOPTS). >
I would also add, if possible: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449862 -> Suggest to specify a way to query for values in IUSE
