On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 14:48:30 -0400
> Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering if we should create a more global function for calling
>> ninja in a consistent way. Maybe we should introduce a NINJAOPTS
>> variable for users to set in make.conf. Should we create a new eclass
>> for this, or just stick it in eutils?
>
> Is NINJAOPTS a variable recognized by ninja or something that would be Gentoo
> specific? It'd be nice if you could parse out what you need from MAKEOPTS
> instead, but I have no strong feelings.
>
I was thinking of something like a "eninja" function, which would call
ninja ${NINJAOPTS}. But parsing MAKEOPTS would probably work just as
well.
> If there's only two users in the tree right now I don't think an eclass is
> warranted.
>
I can't really see ninja use really expanding too much. Maybe I will
wait a while and see if it happens.
