On 06/15/2013 02:34 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > 15.06.2013 18:50, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: >> Over my dead CVS access. > Any reasonable/argumented objection?
to put in different words: We do not want to use untraceable/transient/ephemeral sources for main ebuilds, live ebuilds are corner cases. Ruby related stuff had it worst regarding mis-packaging and total reliance on git with horrid stories they might tell you later over a large coffee. > And, anyway, quoted part is optional behaviour that should just make > ebuild-writing easy. > Mandatory part is to be able to have restrict://foo.bar and downloadable > things at the same time. In fact the restrict part got some proposals and not a terse and stern reject. lu
