On Aug 5, 2013 8:06 AM, "Ulrich Mueller" <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > >>>>> On Mon, 05 Aug 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > > You don't need to see it, because portage sets implicit subslot /0 > > in EAPI="5" so it's there, even if you don't see it. > > Shouldn't the implicit sub-slot be equal to the regular slot? > > Ulrich > Yes, as per EAPI 5 [1], implicit sub-slots are equal to that of the regular slot. As these packages depend specifically on slot 0, the deps could be changed to virtual/jpeg:0 and virtual/openssl:0 respectively, and then updated later should another compatible slot come along (as they'd need to be anyway). Granted, you then lose the automatic rebuild if these packages start using subslots, so it's probably best to leave the slot operator dep.
-Doug [1]: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-820008.2.6
