On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue <e...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Le dimanche 11 août 2013 à 22:09 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit : >> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:29:16 -0500 >> > William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > >> >> You may ask why I have offered patches instead of just fixing the >> >> ebuild since I am a team member. That is because even team members >> >> aren't allowed to touch bugs assigned to syst...@gentoo.org [1], >> > >> > Well, if there are conflicts within a team then I can agree that no >> > member is allowed to touch the bug without a collaborative decision; >> > but from what it appears this bug has been handed in a way that one >> > member appears to take all decisions and the other member has nothing >> > to say. In particular, comments 5 and 11 change the state of the bug >> > without giving any reasoning about why that change in state was made; >> > this is unacceptable, it gives us no reason to believe the state change. >> >> This is expected, as it is similar to how systemd/gnome is managed :) > > I hope you are not talking about the Gentoo Gnome team as this would be > very wrong. Every team member is heard on the team.
I was talking about the designated upstreams. Regards, Alon
