On 12/18/13 11:50 PM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 17:37:56 CEST, "C. Bergström" wrote:
From the perspective of a compiler vendor - I must ask why not?
There is code out there which builds fine under C++98, but fails to
build when C++11 is enabled (as but one exmaple, have a look at [1]).
If moving to C++11 - Isn't that considered just part of the work along
the path? There's some clang tools to help with the migration, but I
don't think anyone expects it to be zero work. The flag is just a way to
a) enable building programs that can be built with c++11 b) flush out
the culprits in the cases it can't be. If (b) is a bug - how else to
find it easily?