On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:02 PM, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> All, > > I would like to bring back for discussion an old patch to glep 48 [1] > which was suggested by Jorge [2]. > > That patch evolved into this one [3], and in the council meeting back > then [4], parts of it made their way into glep 48, but the rest seemed to > be forgotten. > > Attached you will find an updated version of this patch taking into > account the current version of glep 48. > > This is nothing new; the qa team has requested that commit rights be > suspended before. I am just proposing that we actually add the parts of > the old patch to the glep that spell out when and how this can happen. > > Thoughts? > We almost never suspend commit rights. I'm not really finding a situation where this is necessary. Certainly not in the streamlined fashion proposed here. -A > > William > > [1] http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:48 > [2] > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_ac161677a6e06a8647e16420eeae8d47.xml > [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org/msg00144.html > [4] > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20110608-summary.txt >
