05.02.2014 09:41, Tom Wijsman пишет: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 19:28:28 -0800 > Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> I've drafted and thrown away so many replies to Tom in this thread. > > What do you want to tell us about this thread? > >> Thanks for putting up with it, but it's a huge waste of your time. > > Why? This discussion has a goal which we are trying to fulfill; if the > current solution the QA team has formed is insufficient, feel free to > let us know why such that we can reshape it to fit the situation better. >
Maybe we should change our sentence about dropping last stable keywords for slow arches ONLY if version, still marked stable for them is seriously broken? And removing old version ONLY on security issues or maintainer discretion. Cause it seems that not everybody agrees with policy that we are trying to make. -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
