On Fri, 9 May 2014 16:15:58 -0400 Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I think fixing upstream is a no-brainer. It indeed is, this is the goal; you can force them in multiple ways, some of which can be found on the Lua bug and previous discussion(s). > The controversy only exists when upstream refuses to cooperate (which > seems to be the case when we're one of six distros patching it). If > there are other situations where we supply our own files please speak > up. Not that I know of; the refusal to cooperate is what this is all about, see my last response to hwoarang before this mail for a short summary. Though, I think that the Lua maintainers can explain all the details... > When the only issue is maintainer laziness I could see fixing that in > a different way... It has always been an issue; we could always use more manpower, ... https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Contributing_to_Gentoo -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature