On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:35:13 +0000
hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Tom Wijsman:
> > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:58:46 +0200
> > Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:17:31 +0200
> >> Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100
> >>> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>> A more reasonable approach would be for the Council to permit the
> >>>> tree to contain at most 6 wrong lines at any given time. That way
> >>>> any developer wishing to add a new wrong line must previously fix
> >>>> an existing wrong line.
> >>>
> >>> You can suggest that to the Gentoo Council by replying to the
> >>> Council agenda thread on the gentoo-project mailing list.
> >>
> >> whooosh
> >>
> >>
> >>      jer
> >>
> > 
> > boom splat
> > 
> 
> Stop spamming and stop telling obvious things. We can write a bot that
> gives that kind of information.

We can also write a bot that points out that it is "nonsense", "doesn't
matter" and "breakage" as in your original response to this sub thread.

Can you instead tell us what you think makes sense, matters and works?

In this case, for me; whooosh boom splat makes sense, matters and works.

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to